|
Peter Levine
Peter Levine has served as
the General Counsel of the Senate Armed Services Committee
since January 2007. He served in the same position in 2001 and
2002. From 1996 to 2001 and 2003 to 2006, Mr. Levine served as
minority counsel to the Committee. In both positions, Mr.
Levine has been responsible for providing legal advice on
legislation, nominations and other matters coming before the
Committee. He also advises Members of the Committee on
acquisition policy, environmental policy, and defense
management issues impacting the Department of Defense.
Previously, Mr. Levine served
as counsel to Senator Carl Levin of Michigan (1995-1996), and
counsel to the Subcommittee on Oversight of Government
Management of the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee from
(1987-1994). In his capacity as counsel to Senator Levin and
to the Oversight Subcommittee, Mr. Levine was responsible for
efforts to overhaul the lobbying disclosure laws and streamline
the federal procurement system. Mr. Levine was a key
participant in a broad array of legislative measures, including
the Information Technology Management Reform Act of 1996, the
Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, the Senate gift reform
resolution, the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994,
the Clean Air Act of 1990 (mobile sources provisions), the
Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, the Ethics Reform Act of
1989, and the Office of Federal Procurement Policy
Reauthorization Act of 1988. Mr. Levine has also handled a
number of oversight matters, including the 1987 congressional
investigation of the Wedtech Corporation, congressional efforts
to encourage broader use of commercial items and commercial
practices in government procurement, and efforts to identify
and eliminate wasteful practices in the management of defense
inventory.
Prior to joining the Senate
staff, Mr. Levine was an Associate at the law firm of Crowell &
Moring. Mr. Levine graduated summa cum laude from Harvard
College in 1979 and magna cum laude from Harvard Law School,
where he was an editor of the Harvard Law Review, in 1983.
|